Harvard's endowment sold its Ethereum ETF position. Abu Dhabi's Mubadala raised its Bitcoin ETF stake by 16% to $566 million. Two institutional moves in the same week telling the same story: the world's most sophisticated allocators are choosing BTC over ETH. Harvard manages over $50 billion -- when it makes a crypto call, the signal is clear. BTC is the preferred institutional crypto exposure. ETH is getting rotated out. The reasons are not hard to see. Bitcoin has regulatory clarity (CLARITY Act explicitly exempts it), growing corporate treasury adoption, the cleanest inflation-hedge narrative, and the most liquid ETF market. Ethereum's story is more complex: staking yields, L2 fee pressure, ETH/BTC ratio at multi-year lows, and ETH down 6% on the week at $2,185. Complexity is the enemy of institutional allocation in uncertain macro environments. Simple wins. The bull case for ETH still exists. Sharplink's CEO outlined three catalysts for ETH new highs: CLARITY Act exemption, institutional DeFi yield, and the upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade. XRP actually outperformed BTC when CLARITY Act advanced. But right now the institutional money is voting -- and the vote is going to BTC. If you had to choose only one between BTC and ETH for the next 12 months, which would you pick? #HarvardDumpsETHforBTC