Good proposal for any bear nerds
A post in the @berachain governance forum was recently made by @MEADGod in which he discusses the issue of the inefficient emissions (basically the senile validators who don't actively manage their cutting boards) which hurts the eco as well as the revenues of swBERA and BGT
His proposed solution is to give validator positions to engaged and active teams within the eco and remove the sleepy ones.
I don't want to misquote, so read his post here:
I strongly agree with the direction of this proposal. I left a comment with some of my thoughts here:
TLDR of my thoughts:
1) Don't think it would be fair to kick out the sleepy vals from the active set, and probably illegal. However, let's empower teams that will be engaged via foundation delegation to them.
2) These changes will increase swBERA and BGT yields, which is obviously good for BERA and the whole eco. No brainer.
3) @berachain is unique because validators can express some subjectivity in directing emissions and create novel incentive systems - let's lean into that.
535
1
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.