FAQ regarding migration and compensation proposal with CEXs: 1. Why does the compensation plan require a community vote? The UXLINK tokens stolen by the hacker were still in a locked state as stipulated in the whitepaper. These tokens were stolen, illegally unlocked, and sold. According to the whitepaper, any early unlocking of new UXLINK tokens requires a Holders vote. 2. Why does the compensation scheme, apart from 1:1 swap, focus on this specific timeframe? This timeframe refers to the period between the first stolen transfer and the moment UXLINK made its official announcement. During this period, although some media reports and rumors circulated, the official announcement had not yet been released, and some users continued trading and purchased illegally unlocked tokens. Therefore, a tailored compensation plan is required. 3. Why is the current plan mainly centered on CEXs? Because the majority of active UXLINK traders transact via centralized exchanges (CEXs). 4. Why are announcements from different CEXs slightly different, and when will others announce? UXLINK communicates with each CEX based on the same proposal, but each exchange experiences a different scale and context of illegal token trading. In addition, each CEX has its own internal process. We ask for your patience as these announcements may come at different times. 5. How long will it take for exchanges to return frozen hacker assets? We will make every effort to work with exchanges, law enforcement, and security advisors to recover the hacked assets that have been frozen within exchanges. If the recovery and return of these assets cannot be smoothly executed, we will retain the option of community voting for early token unlocking or a buyback plan to compensate the community. 6. Why is there no plan yet for users who bought after Sep-22-2025 05:40 UTC, and why does this require further community discussion and a vote? We are prioritizing the resolution of users impacted before the official announcement. After the announcement, the hacker gained control of the contract and carried out illegal minting, which is a serious breach of the whitepaper’s provisions. As such, the resolution for these cases requires community discussion and voting. 7. Latest update: The hacker is still transferring assets on-chain — any news? Our security advisors have already tracked this transaction and are working with relevant parties to freeze the hacker’s assets.