Another Difficult Personal Decision
We’ve made the difficult personal decision…to stay miles away from every FAKE stablecoins out there and continue trading on @HyperliquidX, where we can literally reverse exposure in minutes with minimal market impact. 🤣
Not because @PacmanBlur, @SmokeyTheBera, or @pauliepunt’s ex–best friend 🤣have been calling this BS out — but because if most of your assets sit off-chain, you should NOT be called a stablecoin, and you definitely shouldn’t be looping leverage on top of something that is illiquid by definition.
@pythianism called it “RWA looping” (conveniently aligned with @hiFramework’s latest investments — we understand it’s easy to sell LPs on a pivot to AI infra during AI-mania kek), but if Buffett called derivatives WMD back in 2008, then looping on illiquid assets with dubious transparency and spreads that clearly can’t outlast on-chain borrow costs is just the tokenized version of WMD.
⸻
Why D2 Doesn’t Touch That Stuff
At D2, we made very conservative design choices since December 2023, and we never marketed our stablecoin-deposit strategy as a “stablecoin.”
Even without a single down epoch (yet 🙏💚), calling it that would have been misleading — that’s exactly why we named it ETH++ and now HYPE++, so users wouldn’t get confused.
Our triple-audited architecture guarantees that all users can withdraw at the same time, under the same conditions, during the withdrawal/deposit window:
This is why even @StreamDefi could withdraw their entire position in one transaction without affecting any other user.
(Receipts attached 👇)
And — broken clock or not, right twice a day 🤣 — Caleb invested in both d2HYPE and HYPE++, and made money in both.
⸻
With the Premise (as @GearboxProtocol correctly pointed out) That Looping is Broken…Curious to See How Others Try to Fix It
I’m genuinely curious how
@sonyasunkim, @3f_romeo, @3FLabs @MikeIppolito_
try to solve this fundamental mismatch, as they discussed on @thebellcurvepod:
But when your last hedge-fund employer is — the largest private lender in Asia with $50B AUM — forgive us for being skeptical that it’s “good” to tokenize and loop leverage on private credit, or anything with the liquidity profile of private credit.
Private credit is a lawyers-and-paranoid-people game.
You negotiate covenants line-by-line, and you need a very specific skillset — the one my ex-colleagues at had.
That skillset is nothing like what Vance learned at Framework. Sorry, mate. VC is a home-run business.Private credit is precision-risk management.
And definitely completely different than the ‘skill set’ @Re7Labs @MEVCapital @hyperithm @TelosConsilium showed ( or lack of, kek)
⸻
And One Last Funny Note…
Sonia referenced @FasanaraDigital MF1as an example of illiquid private credit ( we like the flowcharts 💚)
The stablecoin that Stream Finance used to repay the loan against MF1?
It came from their withdrawal of HYPE++ in one transaction, without any impact on other users.
So to anyone exposed to @StreamDefi: you’re welcome. 💚
Hyperliquid

4.99 K
16
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.


